Speed test matrix
Fara1.5-4B-FP8 on RTX 3090 24GB
vllm · 0.32.0 · FP86 contexts (0–248K) × 8 concurrency levels (1–128) · prefill at 8K, 16K, 32K, 64K, 128K
Hardware
- Type
- Discrete GPU
- GPU
- RTX 3090
- VRAM
- 24 GB
- CPU
- Intel Core i7-9700K (8C)
- RAM
- 32 GB
- OS
- Ubuntu 24.04.5
Engine
- Engine
- vllm
- Version
- 0.32.0
- Quantization
- FP8
- Backend
- cuda
- Repository
- github.com/vllm-project/vllm
- Build
- vllm/vllm-openai:v0.32.0-x86_64
Run
- Served model
- bench
- Revision
- main
- Benchmark tool
- llm-inference-bench v0.8.0
- Decode test
- Fixed duration
- Prefill mode
- Measured during decode warm-up
- Time per measurement
- 30 s
- Max output
- 8,192 tokens
Launch command
# Untuned out-of-the-box baseline. Spec decode: none # 1x RTX 3090 24GB (Zagitta/gpu-unlock), 420 W limit, PCIe Gen3 x16 | Intel Core i7-9700K 8C | 32 GB DDR4 | Ubuntu 24.04.5, NVIDIA driver 580.178.04 vllm serve prithivMLmods/Fara1.5-4B-FP8 --max-model-len 262144 --gpu-memory-utilization 0.94 --max-num-seqs 128 --enable-prefix-caching --trust-remote-code --language-model-only
Prefill
prompt tok/s by context length8K context11.8K694 ms TTFT
16K context11K1,469 ms TTFT
32K context9,9303,252 ms TTFT
64K context8,2547,804 ms TTFT
128K context6,19520,773 ms TTFT
Sustained decode
total tok/s · rows are context length, columns are simultaneous requests| Context | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 128 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 119.535 ms TTFT | 229.645 ms TTFT | 440.568 ms TTFT | 803.898 ms TTFT | 1,409.2156 ms TTFT | 2,189.2230 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 16K | 111.2131 ms TTFT | 204.6133 ms TTFT | 384.9186 ms TTFT | Looped | 1,012.9599 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 32K | 104.4122 ms TTFT | 183.9140 ms TTFT | 340.5204 ms TTFT | 549.6344 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 64K | 92.9207 ms TTFT | 153.1256 ms TTFT | 274.2379 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 128K | 76.1461 ms TTFT | 114.5602 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 248K | 56.8913 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
Looped: the model kept repeating the same text, so the benchmark discarded this measurement. Over capacity: not run because this many requests at this context would exceed the server's KV cache.
TTFT is measured after the benchmark warms the server's prompt cache, so it mostly excludes prefill.
All measurements
Latencies are medians. Total tok/s is output across all simultaneous requests.| Phase | Context | Requests at once | Status | Total tok/s | Per request tok/s | TTFT | Time between tokens | Average active requests | Completed requests | Output tokens | Measured for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prefill | 8K | 1 | Valid | 11.8K | — | 694 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Prefill | 16K | 1 | Valid | 11K | — | 1,469 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Prefill | 32K | 1 | Valid | 9,930.0 | — | 3,252 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Prefill | 64K | 1 | Valid | 8,254.0 | — | 7,804 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Prefill | 128K | 1 | Valid | 6,195.0 | — | 20,773 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 1 | Valid | 119.5 | 119.7 | 35 ms | 8.4 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 3,584 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 2 | Valid | 229.6 | 115.1 | 45 ms | 8.7 ms | 2.0 | 0 | 6,886 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 4 | Valid | 440.5 | 110.7 | 68 ms | 9.0 ms | 4.0 | 0 | 13,212 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 8 | Valid | 803.8 | 101.3 | 98 ms | 9.9 ms | 8.0 | 0 | 24,112 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 16 | Valid | 1,409.2 | 89.3 | 156 ms | 11.2 ms | 16.0 | 0 | 42,272 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 32 | Valid | 2,189.2 | 69.5 | 230 ms | 14.4 ms | 32.0 | 0 | 65,664 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 1 | Valid | 111.2 | 111.4 | 131 ms | 9.0 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 3,336 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 2 | Valid | 204.6 | 102.4 | 133 ms | 9.8 ms | 2.0 | 0 | 6,136 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 4 | Valid | 384.9 | 96.4 | 186 ms | 10.4 ms | 4.0 | 0 | 11,545 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 8 | Looped | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 16 | Valid | 1,012.9 | 62.8 | 599 ms | 15.9 ms | 16.0 | 0 | 30,384 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 1 | Valid | 104.4 | 104.5 | 122 ms | 9.6 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 3,131 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 2 | Valid | 183.9 | 92.0 | 140 ms | 10.9 ms | 2.0 | 0 | 5,518 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 4 | Valid | 340.5 | 85.2 | 204 ms | 11.7 ms | 4.0 | 0 | 10,216 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 8 | Valid | 549.6 | 68.7 | 344 ms | 14.6 ms | 8.0 | 0 | 16,488 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 1 | Valid | 92.9 | 93.0 | 207 ms | 10.8 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 2,787 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 2 | Valid | 153.1 | 76.6 | 256 ms | 13.0 ms | 2.0 | 0 | 4,592 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 4 | Valid | 274.2 | 68.6 | 379 ms | 14.6 ms | 4.0 | 0 | 8,224 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 8 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 1 | Valid | 76.1 | 76.2 | 461 ms | 13.1 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 2,283 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 2 | Valid | 114.5 | 57.3 | 602 ms | 17.4 ms | 2.0 | 0 | 3,435 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 4 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 8 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 1 | Valid | 56.8 | 57.1 | 913 ms | 17.5 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 1,703 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 2 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 4 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 8 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Looped: the model kept repeating the same text, so the benchmark discarded this measurement. Over capacity: not run because this many requests at this context would exceed the server's KV cache.
