Speed test matrix
Fara1.5-27B-AWQ-W4A16 on RTX 3090 24GB
vllm · 0.32.0 · AWQ W4A164 contexts (0–56K) × 8 concurrency levels (1–128) · prefill at 8K, 16K, 32K, 56K
Hardware
- Type
- Discrete GPU
- GPU
- RTX 3090
- VRAM
- 24 GB
- CPU
- Intel Core i7-9700K (8C)
- RAM
- 32 GB
- OS
- Ubuntu 24.04.5
Engine
- Engine
- vllm
- Version
- 0.32.0
- Quantization
- AWQ W4A16
- Backend
- cuda
- Repository
- github.com/vllm-project/vllm
- Build
- vllm/vllm-openai:v0.32.0-x86_64
Run
- Served model
- bench
- Revision
- main
- Benchmark tool
- llm-inference-bench v0.8.0
- Decode test
- Fixed duration
- Prefill mode
- Measured during decode warm-up
- Time per measurement
- 30 s
- Max output
- 8,192 tokens
Launch command
# Untuned out-of-the-box baseline. Spec decode: none. KV cache: fp8 # 1x RTX 3090 24GB (Zagitta/gpu-unlock), 420 W limit, PCIe Gen3 x16 | Intel Core i7-9700K 8C | 32 GB DDR4 | Ubuntu 24.04.5, NVIDIA driver 580.178.04 vllm serve Sohailhosseini/Fara1.5-27B-AWQ-W4A16 --max-model-len 65536 --gpu-memory-utilization 0.94 --max-num-seqs 51 --enable-prefix-caching --trust-remote-code --language-model-only --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --max-cudagraph-capture-size 16
Prefill
prompt tok/s by context length8K context2,1443,819 ms TTFT
16K context2,0248,013 ms TTFT
32K context1,86317,336 ms TTFT
56K context1,66233,928 ms TTFT
Sustained decode
total tok/s · rows are context length, columns are simultaneous requests| Context | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 128 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 47.983 ms TTFT | 89.098 ms TTFT | 171.3227 ms TTFT | 332.3368 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 16K | Looped | 85.8519 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 32K | 45.1665 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 56K | 43.41,242 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
Looped: the model kept repeating the same text, so the benchmark discarded this measurement. Over capacity: not run because this many requests at this context would exceed the server's KV cache.
TTFT is measured after the benchmark warms the server's prompt cache, so it mostly excludes prefill.
All measurements
Latencies are medians. Total tok/s is output across all simultaneous requests.| Phase | Context | Requests at once | Status | Total tok/s | Per request tok/s | TTFT | Time between tokens | Average active requests | Completed requests | Output tokens | Measured for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prefill | 8K | 1 | Valid | 2,144.0 | — | 3,819 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Prefill | 16K | 1 | Valid | 2,024.0 | — | 8,013 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Prefill | 32K | 1 | Valid | 1,863.0 | — | 17,336 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Prefill | 56K | 1 | Valid | 1,662.0 | — | 33,928 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 1 | Valid | 47.9 | 48.0 | 83 ms | 20.9 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 1,437 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 2 | Valid | 89.0 | 44.5 | 98 ms | 22.5 ms | 2.0 | 0 | 2,668 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 4 | Valid | 171.3 | 42.9 | 227 ms | 23.3 ms | 4.0 | 0 | 5,140 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 8 | Valid | 332.3 | 41.6 | 368 ms | 24.0 ms | 8.0 | 0 | 9,969 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 1 | Looped | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 2 | Valid | 85.8 | 42.7 | 519 ms | 23.4 ms | 2.0 | 0 | 2,572 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 4 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 8 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 1 | Valid | 45.1 | 45.1 | 665 ms | 22.2 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 1,353 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 2 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 4 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 8 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 56K | 1 | Valid | 43.4 | 43.4 | 1,242 ms | 23.1 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 1,301 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 56K | 2 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 56K | 4 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 56K | 8 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 56K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 56K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 56K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 56K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Looped: the model kept repeating the same text, so the benchmark discarded this measurement. Over capacity: not run because this many requests at this context would exceed the server's KV cache.
