Speed test matrix
gemma-4-12B-it-FP8-Dynamic on RTX 3090 24GB
vllm · 0.32.0 · FP8 dynamic6 contexts (0–248K) × 8 concurrency levels (1–128) · prefill at 8K, 16K, 32K, 64K, 128K
Hardware
- Type
- Discrete GPU
- GPU
- RTX 3090
- VRAM
- 24 GB
- CPU
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (12C)
- RAM
- 32 GB
- OS
- Ubuntu 24.04.5
Engine
- Engine
- vllm
- Version
- 0.32.0
- Quantization
- FP8 dynamic
- Backend
- cuda
- Repository
- github.com/vllm-project/vllm
- Build
- vllm/vllm-openai:v0.32.0-x86_64
Run
- Served model
- bench
- Revision
- main
- Benchmark tool
- llm-inference-bench v0.8.0
- Decode test
- Fixed duration
- Prefill mode
- Measured during decode warm-up
- Time per measurement
- 30 s
- Max output
- 8,192 tokens
Launch command
# Untuned out-of-the-box baseline. Spec decode: none # 1x RTX 3090 24GB (Zagitta/gpu-unlock), 350 W limit (VBIOS max), PCIe Gen4 x16 | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12C | 32 GB DDR5 | Ubuntu 24.04.5, NVIDIA driver 595.99.02 vllm serve RedHatAI/gemma-4-12B-it-FP8-Dynamic --max-model-len 262144 --gpu-memory-utilization 0.94 --max-num-seqs 128 --enable-prefix-caching --trust-remote-code --language-model-only
Prefill
prompt tok/s by context length8K context3,3852,367 ms TTFT
16K context2,9305,417 ms TTFT
32K context2,30213,726 ms TTFT
64K context1,61838,953 ms TTFT
128K context1,019123,529 ms TTFT
Sustained decode
total tok/s · rows are context length, columns are simultaneous requests| Context | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 128 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 56.935 ms TTFT | 110.746 ms TTFT | 209.847 ms TTFT | 381.158 ms TTFT | 650.7121 ms TTFT | 923.8Requests queued104 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 16K | 49.970 ms TTFT | Looped | 189.7146 ms TTFT | Looped | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 32K | 46.5120 ms TTFT | 92.1156 ms TTFT | Looped | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 64K | Looped | 84.8293 ms TTFT | Looped | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 128K | Looped | Looped | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
| 248K | 28.9Requests queued1,011 ms TTFT | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity | Over capacity |
Requests queued: the server could not run all requests at once, so some waited in a queue. Looped: the model kept repeating the same text, so the benchmark discarded this measurement. Over capacity: not run because this many requests at this context would exceed the server's KV cache.
TTFT is measured after the benchmark warms the server's prompt cache, so it mostly excludes prefill.
All measurements
Latencies are medians. Total tok/s is output across all simultaneous requests.| Phase | Context | Requests at once | Status | Total tok/s | Per request tok/s | TTFT | Time between tokens | Average active requests | Completed requests | Output tokens | Measured for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prefill | 8K | 1 | Valid | 3,385.0 | — | 2,367 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Prefill | 16K | 1 | Valid | 2,930.0 | — | 5,417 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Prefill | 32K | 1 | Valid | 2,302.0 | — | 13,726 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Prefill | 64K | 1 | Valid | 1,618.0 | — | 38,953 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Prefill | 128K | 1 | Valid | 1,019.0 | — | 123,529 ms | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 1 | Valid | 56.9 | 57.1 | 35 ms | 17.5 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 1,707 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 2 | Valid | 110.7 | 55.7 | 46 ms | 17.9 ms | 2.0 | 0 | 3,321 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 4 | Valid | 209.8 | 53.0 | 47 ms | 18.9 ms | 4.0 | 0 | 6,292 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 8 | Valid | 381.1 | 48.5 | 58 ms | 20.6 ms | 8.0 | 0 | 11,432 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 16 | Valid | 650.7 | 42.0 | 121 ms | 23.8 ms | 16.0 | 0 | 19,520 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 32 | Requests queued | 923.8 | 36.3 | 104 ms | 27.5 ms | 26.5 | 0 | 27,691 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 0 | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 1 | Valid | 49.9 | 50.0 | 70 ms | 20.0 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 1,496 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 2 | Looped | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 4 | Valid | 189.7 | 47.6 | 146 ms | 21.0 ms | 4.0 | 0 | 5,688 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 8 | Looped | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 16K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 1 | Valid | 46.5 | 46.5 | 120 ms | 21.5 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 1,394 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 2 | Valid | 92.1 | 46.0 | 156 ms | 21.7 ms | 2.0 | 0 | 2,762 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 4 | Looped | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 8 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 32K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 1 | Looped | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 2 | Valid | 84.8 | 42.4 | 293 ms | 23.6 ms | 2.0 | 0 | 2,542 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 4 | Looped | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 8 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 64K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 1 | Looped | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 2 | Looped | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 4 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 8 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 128K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 1 | Requests queued | 28.9 | 29.4 | 1,011 ms | 34.0 ms | 1.0 | 0 | 868 | 30.0 s |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 2 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 4 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 8 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 16 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 32 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 64 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sustained decode | 248K | 128 | Over capacity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Requests queued: the server could not run all requests at once, so some waited in a queue. Looped: the model kept repeating the same text, so the benchmark discarded this measurement. Over capacity: not run because this many requests at this context would exceed the server's KV cache.
